NRPE installation fails since check_nrpe pluginis not found in the libexec directory

[Rahul Nabar]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:34 PM, James Pratt <jpratt at norwich.edu> wrote:

>
> Yes all appears to be in order...  I'm not sure what to tell you there ....
> The only other thing I can think of is that FC8 is just too old (?)... I
> don't think there are even updates for it anymore...
>
> You may want to just install FC10 or 11 (Or whatever the most recent is!) -
> I remember I once setup Nagios on FC10 or 11 and it was a breeze using RPM's
> for everything, and the Nagios site has good instructions...  (I now use
> CentOS 5.2 - fedora's release cycle is much too fast, and CentOS is as
> stable as RHEL for me...
>

Solved it! Thanks for all your help guys. Well, the 64 bit issue was a red
herring. I am still not a 100% sure what my issue was  but here's what I
think:

It was all a problem with NFS mounted drives. I have a base system and
several of my remote hosts find their executibles by NFS mounts on the
relevant dirs. I was trying to install from one such machine and that's when
I had these problems. I went back and tried on the home-machine where these
NFS mounts reside and it all worked.

No idea why! The only suspicion I have is some soft-links business. These
don't span the NFS mounts I remember.

-- 
Rahul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20090126/c44b9506/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null