Net-SNMP and SNMP4Nagios

[Max H.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Max H. wrote:
>> Justin Craig wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> PLEASE. I read the mailinglist and do not like duplicate messages. So 
> address the mailinglist only.
> 


SORRY, Hugo. Please chill. If when you click Reply it would actually
reply to only nagios-users, then this wouldn't be a problem. For
example, on most mailing lists, if I click Reply or Reply All I get the
appropriate reply to filled in correctly to only the mailing list and no
other addresses.

I don't respond much on this list, and so I'm very used to my other
lists automatically being good when it comes to the reply-tos. When you
click a reply all on this, you get the original sender, you, and the
list instead of just the list. If you only click reply, you get just the
sender.

I apologize for being to quick to click send instead of taking a peek at
the To: fields. Is this working as designed on the Nagios list? Since
other lists I'm part of seem to do it the way I mentioned so that you
never worry about sending dups.

Max


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFP6yWHoeeepPau2ERAhIvAJ9VYmuldvexQT5jLsUmV4yfwCFliQCfedak
jvXBdGsgEiFT0u7yMRgcwAU=
=eOFE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null