"Agentless" monitoring with Nagios?

Keller, Steve SKeller at ea.com
Tue May 16 01:02:00 CEST 2006


Wow!  I did not expect a reply so quickly!

We'll look into fsh, it looks promising.

Thanks for the advice.
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Martin [mailto:jhmartin at toger.us] 
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 3:56 PM
To: Keller, Steve
Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] "Agentless" monitoring with Nagios?

On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 03:34:53PM -0700, Keller, Steve wrote:
> a replacement.  One of the issues we have is that we cannot, for
various
> (mostly political) reasons, install an agent on the hosts we monitor.
By any chance is SNMP already in place on the target hosts? That
might cut down on the number of agent-on-demand checks you have
to run.

> So my question is, does anyone know of a reasonable approach to
> agentless monitoring using Nagios?  We are planning to try SSH4, which
Check out FSH (http://freshmeat.net/projects/fsh/) which does a
similiar thing. That should take care of the SSH overhead problem.


> this has the problem that a host which is down, or busy, could delay
> checking other hosts.  
If you are writing this in perl, you can have your plugins
timeout gracefully to prevent that. Nagios can be configured to
time out plugins as well.

-Jason Martin
-- 
"Keyboard? How quaint!" - Scotty
This message is PGP/MIME signed.


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list