Does anyone have event log monitors that *work*?

C. Bensend benny at bennyvision.com
Sat Mar 27 00:53:14 CET 2010


> Likewise please ask again if you're still stuck.  I don't mind having
> another bash at some of these issues when I have a minute.
>
> I just read your thread on the NSClient++ forum too.  I have found
> that whenever I try to combine too many matches in one check it simply
> doesn't work right (can't remember the precise details).  So I
> normally try to match on as few things as possible for each check even
> if that means I'm casting the net maybe a little wider than I'd really
> like.

Thanks everyone for your suggestions...  In the end, I gave up on
using either NSClient++ or the Nagios EventLog Agent to check my
windows event logs.  While I certainly will admit the problem
still may have been with me, I have come to the conclusion that
either they're not designed to do what I needed (to find a single
event ID) or they're inconsistent/under-documented.

I ended up going with check_logfiles from ConSol:

http://labs.consol.de/lang/en/nagios/check_logfiles/

Not only are the developers responsive, but it *works*.  I use
it with a very flexible definition via NSClient++, and so far
it's performing *exactly* like I need.  :)

Thanks again, everyone!

Benny


-- 
Whoever said that hell hath no fury like a women scorned never
owned a cat.
                                                  -- bash.org


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list