NRPE question

shadih rahman shadhin71 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 22 21:05:07 CET 2010


I have thought about this solution but I have an issue with this.  Let us
say the machine has high load.   Now, I presume, we are checking the number
of "nrpe" processes on client host via nrpe.  If the load is high, the check
for number of nrpe processes will fail, which in turn would fork possibly
another nrpe process?  Please advise on this.  Thanks

>
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:34 PM, <patrick.morris at hp.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, shadih rahman wrote:
>>
>> > I am running nrpe as daemon rather than xinetd.  I have one server which
>> showed high load and all nrpe checks where showing UNKNOWN.  Later on I
>> logged into the box and I saw there were 382 nrpe process running.  Can
>> someone shed some light into this?  Thanks
>>
>> Happens here all the time.  I have a Nagios check that looks for
>> high numbers of NRPE processes and restarts it if it goes out of
>> control.
>>
>> I'm not sure what causes it; the brute force method we're using here has
>> been enough to keep it under control.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cordially,
> Shadhin Rahman
>



-- 
Cordially,
Shadhin Rahman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20100222/2c144c7b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


More information about the Users mailing list