Antoher distributed config question

[Andreas Ericsson]

On 12/16/2010 11:45 PM, stan wrote:
> Sorry for the torment of questions on this. We are trying to get this
> working with "end of year" money, so we are supposed to have it working
> before Jan 1 :-)
> 
> We have the parent and child talking to each other using NSCA. We are
> getting updates on the child system on both the host detail, and service
> detail screens. On the parent system only the service detail screen is
> updating. The host detail screen continues to show "PENDING", with the red
> X thta indicates active checks are disabled.
> 
> I am looking at the data stream coming in on the pipe, and all I see are
> messages like this:
> 
> [1292539309] PROCESS_SERVICE_CHECK_RESULT;AW210B;RDP;0;PING OK - Packet
> loss = 0%, RTA = 0.37 ms
> 
> Should I be seeing ones with something like HOST_SERVICE_CHECK_RESULT ?
> 
> 

If you've set up the obsessive host check command too and not only the
obsessive service check command, then yes. Otherwise, no. But you'll
only see it when host checks are run, so if you've turned off scheduled
host checks you won't see it very frequently.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson at op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231

Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
on peace.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null