Windows Agent - Passive Checks

Greg Martin gmartin at gmartin.org
Wed Oct 21 04:39:04 CEST 2009


Tony, IMO,  the network traffic generated by the service checks is 
trivial in the scheme of things.  Also, do you really need to worry 
about ALL the services on your windows box?  If. say you run IIS on the 
server, aren't you most interested in knowing IIS Admin and WWW services 
are running?  Checking all the services may be overkill just as querying 
each from nagios may be.

However, if you still feel the need, you could write a script to check 
the status of all the services locally and use NRPE to call the custom 
script.  Powershell or even Windows batch could probably do this for 
you.  This makes the check active but rolls all the services into one.

\\Greg



Anthony Montibello wrote:
> I was going to add that to NC_Net but if it only reports on trouble 
> then how do you know it has not stalled without freshness checking ?
>>> On NC_net there is a similar command but it has slightly different 
> requirements,
> 1) you can configure NC_Net to preform different Passive checks, but 
> not setup a NSCA transport.
> 2) Active check NC_NEt using GETALLCHECKS command (via check_nc_net 
> thats compatible with check_nt)
> � This returns All checks OK with all performance data or a list of 
> failed passive check and performance data.
> Thus a single Command in Nagios for any number of Passive checks 
> configured, then only� details when something goes wrong.
>>> Tony ( author of NC_Net) windows plugin
>>
>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Tony <nagios at aspireinternet.co.uk 
> <mailto:nagios at aspireinternet.co.uk>> wrote:
>
>     Hi List
>>     I've used Nagios for a few years now and up to now have only
>     really monitored Linux servers and Network hardware.
>     However I'm now having to monitor Windows servers more and more,
>     which isn't a problem as there are plenty of Windows agents
>     available to monitor Windows servers.
>>     However I was wondering if anyone had come across/written an agent
>     that sits on a Windows server and sends Passive checks to Nagios
>     if say a service stops, no matter what the service is. Rather than
>     having Nagios query the host every x minutes and creating network
>     traffic when there isn't any reason to if all the services Nagios
>     wants to check are up and running.
>>     Just a thought...
>>     Thanks
>     Tony
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
>     is the only developer event you need to attend this year.
>     Jumpstart your
>     developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market
>     and stay
>     ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
>     http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
>     _______________________________________________
>     Nagios-users mailing list
>     Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
>     ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
>     reporting any issue.
>     ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   
>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


More information about the Users mailing list