RFC Possible bug in 3.0 alpha event handlers/macros ... [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stanley.HOPCROFT at deewr.gov.au wrote:

| "If you want to use alpha/rc1, 2, 3 .. nagios, don't whine about it on
| Nag users".

The point is that doing a bug report on 3.0alphaX where there are at
least 2 release candidates have followed is not usefull.

If the problem still exists in in the latest release then it makes sense
to report it as such. But for any software is it not usefull to use
older versions to send in a bug report.

So my recommendations still stands. Upgrade to the latest 3.0 release
candidate and retest. Any other 3.0 version of nagios should be
considere obsolete and a bug report against those versions is pointless.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHrjYGBvzDRVjxmYERAvHPAJ45ktMlAvezrwDhBCYcNAwHRkmnqgCeMoNW
AQaZQeuzASVxH8WSvTNA8/o=
=icc5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null