dec 31 1969 in event log

[Hendrik Baecker]

Hi,

While it's in a timely manner that occurrs every midnight, please let  
us know your cron config and perhaps your timeserver configuration.

Regards,
Hendrik

Am 28.12.2008 um 22:39 schrieb "Seth Simmons" <ssimmons at cymfony.com>:

> It's nagios 3.06
> What configuration do you want to know?
> I'm running on fedora 9 monitoring 102 hosts, 1441 services
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hugo van der Kooij [mailto:hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 4:20 PM
> To: Nagios Users Mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] dec 31 1969 in event log
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Seth Simmons wrote:
>> Every day in the event log at midnight it shows an event in the list
> of
>> service states at midnight dated 12/31/1969
>> The log looks something like this:
>>
>> [12-27-2008 00:00:00] CURRENT SERVICE STATE: serverA;serviceA1;OK
>> [12-27-2008 00:00:00] CURRENT SERVICE STATE: serverA;serviceA2;OK
>> [12-27-2008 00:00:00] CURRENT SERVICE STATE: serverB;serviceB1;OK
>>
>>
> --- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>> December 31, 1969 19:00
>>
> --- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>>
>> [12-31-1969 19:00:00]
>>
>>
> --- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>> December 28, 2008 00:00
>>
> --- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>>
>> [12-27-2008 00:00:00] CURRENT SERVICE STATE: serverB;serviceB2;OK
>> [12-27-2008 00:00:00] CURRENT SERVICE STATE: serverB;serviceB3;OK
>> [12-27-2008 00:00:00] CURRENT SERVICE STATE: serverC;serviceC1;OK
>
> To quote mr Spock (pointy ears): Fascinating.
>
> Given your timezone it looks like something with a unixdate drops to 0
> shortly. That would account for the exact date/time stamp. (unix  
> epoch -
> 5 hours) Just totally unclear why it pops up.
>
> Just so we know. Is this with Nagios version 1.0? And I feel some  
> people
> might like to hear the config from you as well.
>
> Hugo.
>
> - --
> hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
> PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
>    A: Yes.
>    >Q: Are you sure?
>    >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>    >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
> Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
>
> Nid wyf yn y swyddfa ar hyn o bryd. Anfonwch unrhyw waith i'w  
> gyfieithu.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAklX7WoACgkQBvzDRVjxmYGxbACgsFKnzmsFh5+qoHIahIAzEVj7
> yyQAn0u2Ye0EKmiSH+hUbKkWRrsWGhUr
> =h3Dl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when  
> reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null