Log startup time for nagios 2.7

Marantz, Roy Roy.Marantz at deshaw.com
Thu May 3 15:31:19 CEST 2007


Nope.

aggregate_status_updates=1 
status_update_interval=15

Roy
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [mailto:dermoth at aei.ca] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 11:43 PM
To: Marantz, Roy
Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Log startup time for nagios 2.7

Are you using aggregate_status_updates=0 in nagios.cfg by any chances?

Thomas

On 02/05/07 10:04 PM, Marantz, Roy wrote:
> No, but I was looking into it.  I didn't think it would help the
nagios
> process startup, does it? 
> Roy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ton Voon [mailto:ton.voon at altinity.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:13 PM
> To: Marantz, Roy
> Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Log startup time for nagios 2.7
> 
> 
> On 2 May 2007, at 21:48, Marantz, Roy wrote:
> 
>> I'm using Nagios 2.7 and it seem like I just passed some threshold  
>> such
>> that the  startup time for nagios is
>> long (> 2 minutes) now.  Any ideas on how to improve this would be
>> appreciated.  I notice that nagios 3.x
>> has some nice sounding support for quicker startups, but I don't  
>> believe
>> I should be running version 3
>> in production yet.  I wasn't able to search the nagios-users archive
>> because all my queires on sourceforge
>> were timing out so I apologize is this has been answered before.
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list