Nagios-users Digest, Vol 15, Issue 10

Noel Dave profoundmove at gmail.com
Tue Aug 7 11:09:28 CEST 2007


On 8/7/07, nagios-users-request at lists.sourceforge.net <
nagios-users-request at lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> Send Nagios-users mailing list submissions to
>        nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        nagios-users-request at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        nagios-users-owner at lists.sourceforge.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Nagios-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. check_nt default port (sujith h)
>   2. Re: check_nt default port (Frost, Mark {PBG})
>   3. Re: two notifications everytime (Marc Powell)
>   4. Re: two notifications everytime (Lalita Drolia)
>   5. Re: two notifications everytime (Lalita Drolia)
>   6. Re: two notifications everytime (Marc Powell)
>   7. N2rrd problem (Mattia)
>   8. CGIs path to css is wrong (Marcus Rej?s)
>   9. Re: dont want notification when machine reboots (Jim Avery)
> 10. Re: dont want notification when machine reboots (Marc Powell)
> 11. Re: N2rrd problem (Dani)
> 12. Re: Trap Handling Scheme (Jim Avery)
> 13. Re: check_nt default port (Hugo van der Kooij)
> 14. Redudant checks (but also two notifies) (GJP)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:45:48 +0530
> From: "sujith h" <sujith.linux at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Nagios-users] check_nt default port
> To: "Nagios Users mailinglist" <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID:
>        <e4a2c74c0708060015s289041fau49da4bed0cec94f0 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Can any one help me to find the default port used by nagios for the
> plugin check_nt(not NSClient).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sujith Haridasan
>
> --
> ?????? ???????
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 03:22:33 -0400
> From: "Frost, Mark {PBG}" <mark.frost1 at pepsi.com>
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] check_nt default port
> To: "sujith h" <sujith.linux at gmail.com>
> Cc: Nagios Users mailinglist <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID:
>        <7F477BD26F545A4C8E4779754A38EFB30219E2C1 at PEPWMV00043.corp.pep.pvt>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Sujith,
>
> If you run "check_nt --help" you'll see a bunch of output including the
> following:
>
> -p, --port=INTEGER
>   Optional port number (default: 1248)
>
> Mark


Sujith,
try  port 5667



________________________________
>
>        From: nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:
> nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of sujith h
>        Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 3:16 AM
>        To: Nagios Users mailinglist
>        Subject: [Nagios-users] check_nt default port
>
>
>        Can any one help me to find the default port used by nagios for the
>        plugin check_nt(not NSClient).
>
>        Cheers,
>
>        Sujith Haridasan
>
>        --
>        ?????? ???????
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:09:17 -0500
> From: "Marc Powell" <marc at ena.com>
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] two notifications everytime
> To: <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID: <A7B0A9F02975A74A845FE85D0B95B8FA039296CC at misex01.ena.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="US-ASCII"
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:nagios-users-
> > bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Lalita Drolia
> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 12:49 AM
> > To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [Nagios-users] two notifications everytime
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been using nagios for a long time now. But suddenly since a
> couple
> > of days, all email notifications are being sent out twice.
>
> Sounds like you may have 2 copies of nagios running at the same time.
>
> --
> Marc
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:14:28 -0700
> From: "Lalita Drolia" <ldrolia at bea.com>
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] two notifications everytime
> To: "Marc Powell" <marc at ena.com>, <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID:
>        <2402BA0C1F52594E8E271233F62EB6A904067080 at repbex02.amer.bea.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> I didn't know that was possible. If it is, then that must be the case.
> Please tell me how can I check and stop that?
>
> Regards,
> Lalita
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Marc
> Powell
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 5:39 PM
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] two notifications everytime
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:nagios-users-
> > bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Lalita Drolia
> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 12:49 AM
> > To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [Nagios-users] two notifications everytime
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been using nagios for a long time now. But suddenly since a
> couple
> > of days, all email notifications are being sent out twice.
>
> Sounds like you may have 2 copies of nagios running at the same time.
>
> --
> Marc
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or
> entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and
> have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email
> and then delete it.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 05:25:01 -0700
> From: "Lalita Drolia" <ldrolia at bea.com>
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] two notifications everytime
> To: "Marc Powell" <marc at ena.com>, <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID:
>        <2402BA0C1F52594E8E271233F62EB6A90406708B at repbex02.amer.bea.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I grepped for nagios process and killed one instance. I will see if I
> still get two instances.
>
> Thank you very much Marc for your help, as always. :)
>
> Lalita
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Marc
> Powell
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 5:39 PM
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] two notifications everytime
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:nagios-users-
> > bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Lalita Drolia
> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 12:49 AM
> > To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [Nagios-users] two notifications everytime
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been using nagios for a long time now. But suddenly since a
> couple
> > of days, all email notifications are being sent out twice.
>
> Sounds like you may have 2 copies of nagios running at the same time.
>
> --
> Marc
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or
> entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and
> have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email
> and then delete it.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:28:56 -0500
> From: "Marc Powell" <marc at ena.com>
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] two notifications everytime
> To: <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID: <A7B0A9F02975A74A845FE85D0B95B8FA039296CD at misex01.ena.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="US-ASCII"
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lalita Drolia [mailto:ldrolia at bea.com]
> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 7:14 AM
> > To: Marc Powell; nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] two notifications everytime
> >
> >
> > I didn't know that was possible. If it is, then that must be the case.
> > Please tell me how can I check and stop that?
>
> The best way is to stop nagios then see if there are any that remain. If
> so, kill them and restart nagios.
>
> --
> Marc
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:57:06 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "Mattia" <mattia at sinapto.net>
> Subject: [Nagios-users] N2rrd problem
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID:
>        <36537.217.221.111.31.1186405026.squirrel at webmail.sinapto.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a working Nagios 2.9 installation running on Red Hat Enterprise
> Linux 4.
> Now I'm trying to setup n2rrd and rrd2graph, to get performance and
> availability reports from within the web interface.
>
> I've installed and configured n2rrd 1.2, and configured Nagios to process
> performance data in nagios.cfg
>
> process_performance_data=1
> host_perfdata_command=process-host-perfdata
> service_perfdata_command=process-service-perfdata
>
> this two commands are defined as follow
>
> define command{
>        command_name    process-host-perfdata
>        command_line    /usr/local/bin/n2rrd.pl -d -c
> /etc/n2rrd/n2rrd.conf -T $LASTHOSTCHECK$ -H $HOSTNAME$ -s
> "check_icmp" -o "$HOSTOUTPUT$"
>       }
>
> define command{
>        command_name    process-service-perfdata
>        command_line    /usr/local/bin/n2rrd.pl -d -c
> /etc/n2rrd/n2rrd.conf -T $LASTSERVICECHECK$ -H $HOSTNAME$ -s
> "$SERVICEDESC$" -o "$SERVICEPERFDATA$"
>        }
>
> however rrd are generated, but never updated, and in n2rrd logs I see
>
> n2rrd:mailallarm: Host = mailallarm, Service name = check_icmp, Check
> result = PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 0.23 ms
> n2rrd:mailallarm: Updating ds_names: loss:RTA, ds_values: 0:0.23 in file:
> /var/log/nagios/rra/mailallarm/mailallarm_icmp.rrd
> n2rrd:mailallarm: ERROR while updating
> /var/log/nagios/rra/mailallarm/mailallarm_icmp.rrd: unknown DS name 'loss'
>
> has anyone any clue?
>
> Thanks
>
> Cheers
>
> Mattia
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:48:00 +0200
> From: Marcus Rej?s <marcus at rejas.se>
> Subject: [Nagios-users] CGIs path to css is wrong
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <20070806124800.GA20041 at rejas.se>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hello!
>
> Before the upcoming Nagios 3 release we have started to test the
> cvs-version. But in our CGI-scripts we have this header.
>
> <HEAD>
> <TITLE>
> Nagios Tactical Monitoring Overview
> </TITLE>
> <LINK REL='stylesheet' TYPE='text/css' HREF='common.css'>
> <LINK REL='stylesheet' TYPE='text/css' HREF='tac.css'>
> </HEAD>
>
> However the stylesheets are in /stylesheets. There are several
> work-arounds for this at our site but I'm wondering if this is a
> configuration error we made or is something currently broken?
>
> Regards.
>
> /Marcus
>
> --
> Marcus Rej?s           jabber:   marcus at jabber.rejas.se       ,= ,-_-. =.
> Rej?s Datakonsult      e-mail:   marcus at rejas.se             ((_/)o o(\_))
> Kaserngatan 1          web:      http://www.rejas.se          `-'(. .)`-'
> s-761 46 Norrt?lje     gpg-key:  http://www.rejas.se/rejas.asc    \_/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:15:13 +0100
> From: "Jim Avery" <jim at jimavery.me.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] dont want notification when machine
>        reboots
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID:
>        <765d77c80708060715y73a5b951m287316b46b72afac at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 27/07/07, Jim Avery <jim at jimavery.me.uk> wrote:
> > I've been having a similar problem and have thought about the solution
> > but haven't gotten around to implementing it yet.  Mark Powell's
> > suggestion to rely on the service check notification is absolutely
> > right when you want to ignore brief bounces or lost pings.  I'm going
> > to do just that, but I will still have a host notification enabled
> > too...
> >
> > I'll configure things so that the on-call engineers get the ping
> > service notification rather than the host notification - they don't
> > want to know about servers briefly bounced.  The host notifications
> > I'll send only to me by email so I will know the next day which
> > servers have bounced overnight.  I'm hoping that will bring me the
> > best of both worlds.
>
> For the record, I tried my variation of Mark's suggestion and it
> didn't work because I hadn't taken the trouble to understand it
> properly.
>
> If I leave host checks enabled (contrary to Mark's advice), then as
> soon as any service check fails, Nagios will try the host check which
> will fail too and will immediately set the service check to a HARD
> status.
>
> Mark's suggestion works because host checks are disabled.  The
> possible down-side is that you don't then see hosts go down in Nagios
> as such.  The host up/down status is important to me because it is
> used in the Nexsm status map display.  I think unfortunately I'm going
> to use escalations instead, although it's going to be a bit messy.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:40:44 -0500
> From: "Marc Powell" <marc at ena.com>
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] dont want notification when machine
>        reboots
> To: <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID: <A7B0A9F02975A74A845FE85D0B95B8FA08276C1D at misex01.ena.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="US-ASCII"
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:nagios-users-
> > bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Jim Avery
> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 9:15 AM
> > To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] dont want notification when machine
> reboots
> >
>
>
> > Mark's suggestion works because host checks are disabled.  The
> > possible down-side is that you don't then see hosts go down in Nagios
> > as such.  The host up/down status is important to me because it is
> > used in the Nexsm status map display.  I think unfortunately I'm going
> > to use escalations instead, although it's going to be a bit messy.
>
> Yup. The good news is that nagios-3 addresses this kind of situation by
> making host checks work like service checks.
>
> --
> Marc
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:15:35 +0200
> From: Dani <dani at tydnet.org>
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] N2rrd problem
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <200708061715.35277.dani at tydnet.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> A Dilluns 06 Agost 2007, Mattia va escriure:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi Mattia,
>
> > n2rrd:mailallarm: Host = mailallarm, Service name = check_icmp, Check
> > result = PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 0.23 ms
> > n2rrd:mailallarm: Updating ds_names: loss:RTA, ds_values: 0:0.23 in
> > file: /var/log/nagios/rra/mailallarm/mailallarm_icmp.rrd
> > n2rrd:mailallarm: ERROR while updating
> > /var/log/nagios/rra/mailallarm/mailallarm_icmp.rrd: unknown DS name
> > 'loss'
> >
> > has anyone any clue?
>
> Is telling you that found loss = sth but you did not defined this in
> icmp.t under templates/rra/.
>
> just define it even when you are not to finally graph it
>
> -s 300 # 5minutes
>        DS:rta:GAUGE:600:0:U
> ->   DS:loss:GAUGE:600:0:U
>        RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:1:1440   #day
>        RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:30:336   #week
>        RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:120:360  #month
>        RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:1440:365 #year
>        RRA:MAX:0.5:1:1440   #day
>        RRA:MAX:0.5:30:336   #week
>        RRA:MAX:0.5:120:360  #month
>        RRA:MAX:0.5:1440:365 #year
>        RRA:MIN:0.5:1:1440   #day
>        RRA:MIN:0.5:30:336   #week
>        RRA:MIN:0.5:120:360  #month
>        RRA:MIN:0.5:1440:365 #year
>
> This comes from "Packet Loss" but rrd is taken the last word... use code.tto convert packet loss to Packet_Loss for instance.
>
> > Thanks
> > Cheers
> > Mattia
>
> good luck,
>
> dani
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:32:50 +0100
> From: "Jim Avery" <jim at jimavery.me.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Trap Handling Scheme
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID:
>        <765d77c80708060832t1188fb83t1dd9fe03e72edc97 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 06/08/07, Paul Dugas <paul at dugas.cc> wrote:
> > What about all the other "pending doom" traps the UPS can send?
> > Temperatures, bad batteries, etc.?  Do I have a corresponding service
> > for every one and manually clear them when they fire?  Or, could I have
> > a single generic "TRAP" service that logged and send notifications for
> > them?
>
> I have a bit of a mixture.  For most, I just have a generic "SNMP"
> service for the host and have it always go "Critical" regardless of
> what the trap is.  So long as the traps are few and far between, this
> is no problem, I just manually reset the status to OK by sending a
> passive check result once I've investigated what the problem is.  I
> only bother to configure specific named trap services in Nagios where
> it makes sense to do so.
>
> If you have a setup where you let Nagios process the trap which sets
> status back to OK, it may make sense to have Nagios notify by email so
> these traps won't go unnoticed.  A danger, though, is that if you get
> a storm of traps from a system, you could be inundated with emails.
>
> I have configured the event handler script so that if any traps arrive
> from hosts which I don't know about, they go to the generic "SNMP"
> service for localhost.  That way, if someone is setting up a new
> device and points traps at my Nagios system, I will know about it as
> soon as any trap arrives and can retrospectively configure Nagios to
> recognise that host.
>
> I also have a line in snmptt.ini like so:
> unknown_trap_exec =
> /usr/local/nagios/libexec/eventhandler/submit_unknown_check_result
>
> this writes the trap information to a log file if snmptt comes across
> a trap which isn't defined in the snmptt.conf file.  I have a Nagios
> service defined to check this log file so I will know if any unknown
> traps come in - I can then go find the relevant MIB and add it to the
> snmptt.conf file.
>
> I can't pretend I'm entirely happy with the way my system works, as
> it's not entirely intuitive, but it is catch-all so I'm unlikely to
> miss anything!
>
> hth,
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 19:32:00 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org>
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] check_nt default port
> To: sujith h <sujith.linux at gmail.com>
> Cc: Nagios Users mailinglist <nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
> Message-ID:
>        <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708061930240.30495 at faramir.hugo.vanderkooij.org>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, sujith h wrote:
>
> > Can any one help me to find the default port used by nagios for the
> plugin check_nt(not NSClient).
>
> Use the command `netstat -na` to detect all listening ports. Do this with
> and without the service running.
>
> Hugo.
>
> --
>        hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org        http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
>            This message is using 100% recycled electrons.
>
>        Some men see computers as they are and say "Windows"
>        I use computers with Linux and say "Why Windows?"
>                (Thanks JFK, for the insight.)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:44:46 +0200
> From: GJP <gjp at gpnet.nl>
> Subject: [Nagios-users] Redudant checks (but also two notifies)
> To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <200708061944.46723.gjp at gpnet.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have setup an off-site client under nagios to do redundant checks on a
> webserver. However if something goes wrong I also get two notifies. This
> is
> correct but I would like only one. Anybody solved this before?
>
> I am thinking of (well, want to examine) the two following scenarios.
>
> Create a bogus service with a dependancy to two http checks. So if either
> one
> fails have the bogus one fail and notify?
>
> And maybe I could use the check_cluster plugin. Define a cluster (with the
> two
> services) and make it only send notifies if both nodes (services) decide a
> service failure.
>
> Any pointers are very welcome.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gerard.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
>
>
> End of Nagios-users Digest, Vol 15, Issue 10
> ********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20070807/3f2d330b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


More information about the Users mailing list