check_* -w and -c switches

Geoff Rispin grispin at paradata.com
Fri Mar 5 01:54:42 CET 2004


Sorry,  my mistake....

the -l command is part of the nagios-statd plugin.

Geoff



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul L. Allen [mailto:pla at softflare.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 4:51 PM
To: Geoff Rispin
Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: check_* -w and -c switches


Geoff Rispin writes: 

> you want to use the -l flag.   RTFM

I do?  Why?  I can do everything I want to do without resorting to a
 -l option. 

OK, I'll take your word for it that -l opens the gates to paradise
and gives me 24 virgins and all sorts of other goodies.  Hold on
a second... 

  /usr/lib/nagios/check_procs -h 

How strange!  Nothing whatsoever about a -l option. 

This is bizarre.  The answer I gave pointed the guy at how to do what
he wanted to do and I know it was a valid answer because I use it myself.
The answer you gave looks like a crock of unmentionable according to
the primitive help from check_procs. 

Maybe, if I dig in the source, I'll see that -l is a crock of gold at
the end of the rainbow.  However, the answer I gave does not involve
digging into the source and is known (by me) to work. 

Please explain why you believe that -l is the answer. 

-- 
Paul Allen
Softflare Support 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list