patch: total macros

[Andreas Ericsson]

Wayne Mery wrote:
> On 10/21/2004 1:34 PM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> 
>> Wayne Mery wrote:
>>
>>> Gee, what a hornets nest.  Who'da thought Ethan would be so 
>>> Territorial, with a big T. I thought all the comments were 
>>> supportive. I know mine were.
>>>
>>> Certainly some sensitivity and frustration in his response. From the 
>>> user's viewpoint I'm not sure he's taking a very balanced perspective 
>>> - example Nag1.2 tarball is dated Feb 2004 - but then I guess he 
>>> doesn't have to, he's the owner and doesn't want partners.
>>>
>>> Unfortuately the present 'patch system' via email doesn't lend itself 
>>> to tracking/management like one might get with bugzilla or 
>>> sourceforge. It really would be nice if there were a more formal bug 
>>> and patch system.  Am I missing something?
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps something like this;
>> http://oss.op5.se/mantis
>>
>> It works with https as well.
>>
> Looks OK.  Active product which is good.
> Advantages over bugzilla?  Or simply setting up a patch project on 
> sourceforge?
> 

I haven't worked that much with bugzilla, but it's way better than 
what's available at sourceforge.

Check out www.mantisbt.org or raxnet.net (click your way through) for a 
live demo that's in active use.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson at op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Lead Developer


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl