A 1.3 Nag release ?

[Stanley Hopcroft]

Dear Sir,

I am writing to thank you for your  letter and say,

On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 07:57:13AM -0600, Cook, Garry wrote:
> 
> I would be interested in seeing this. Although not due to the BSD issues
> that you mention below. I have trouble getting buy-in to upgrade to the
> latest 'non-stable' version, so a 1.3 release with added patches would
> be ideal. Do you see a benefit from also adding the chained hash patch
> to speed up the CGIs?
>

thank you very much for mentioning this.

Yes, this is in my view is a good win without much cost.

I am using the (glib based ?) patch for Nag 1.x and am pleased with the 
CGI acceleration it provides.

However, the patch as published is incomplete and needs reworking before 
it enters a release branch. For example, the restart function (HUP 
signal) no longer works; my Nag needs to be stopped and started after a 
config change.

> 
> Garry W. Cook, CCNA
> Network Infrastructure Manager
> MACTEC, Inc. - http://www.mactec.com/
> 303.308.6228 (Office) - 720.220.1862 (Mobile)

Yours sincerely.

-- 
Stanley Hopcroft

Network specialist, IT Infrastructure
IP Australia
Ph: (02) 6283 3189  Fax: (02) 6281 1353
PO Box 200 Woden  ACT 2606
http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285