<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Klaus Umbach wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:92119d860808270240h5865faeas4a720359cf36b147@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
NRPE? To check a Windows-Box? No, that's not really funny...<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
huh?<br>
Why not?<br>
I'we always thought of NRPE to be vastly superior to the NSClient
protocol myself...<br>
<font color="#888888"></font></blockquote>
<div><br>
With NRPE you need a bunch of plugins on the client you are
monitoring, with NSCA the standard-stuff is integrated. NRPE is much
more configuration cost than NSCA/nsclient++, because you can't just
aptitude install them. :-)<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
NSClient++ can do the exact same things (and a lot more) via NRPE then
via NSClient with the same (or about the same) amount of
configuration...<br>
<br>
// Michael Medin<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:92119d860808270240h5865faeas4a720359cf36b147@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br>
-<br>
Klaus<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
-- <br>
First Official Internetdenier<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>