<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7651.14"> <TITLE>RFC Possible bug in 3.0 alpha event handlers/macros ... [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY>  Dear Hugo, I am writing to thank you for your letter and say, > Message: 8 > Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 09:23:29 +0100 > From: Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij@vanderkooij.org> > Have you considered that the changelog might not be complete? Of course ! But don't you think a _major_ change in behaviour should be documented, or a serious bug - think about it, blowing third party software out of the water - acknowledged ? > I strongly recommend you to DO upgrade first before you even think of sending in a bug report. Is it a bug ? If so, is it it fixed in rc2 ? If it hasn't been fixed in rc2, will it be fixed in the release ? > If you cannot do so as soon as you have a couple of minutes then you should not be running 3.0 alpha to begin with. Hey man ! I spend time fulfilling _my_ responsibility by reporting a potential problem and being perfectly willing to be corrected, and you say I should not test new software and identify bugs - unless I am willing to do things you obviously are not - so that when it is released, others are saved others from those bugs ! I could have diffed rc1, rc2 and alpha for an undocumented change; I could have identified the code (maybe) at fault, and may-maybe submitted a patch; and yes, I was hoping, someone else might for me because it is not my code, I am not familiar with it, and I lack the talent to do it quickly, if at at all. In other words, that's why I am asking for help, having done as much as I could. Tell me I should upgrade to rc2 and the problem will go away because of this evidence (such as was sent), and I will gladly upgrade (since I was hoping to go to the release without every step, because for me, upgrade means package build, test, install and possibly rollback) and report the result. Otherwise, your message is clearly "If you want to use alpha/rc1, 2, 3 .. nagios, don't whine about it on Nag users". > And please do not reply to a message if you want to create a new thread. It makes a mess of any threading system (like the archives) > and in this case even the subject is rather uninformative. I beg your pardon (my employers domain has changed so the mail with the correct subject and content bounced and as you can see from my tone, it is starting to become too hard). > Hugo. Classification: UNCLASSIFIED </BODY> </HTML>