<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">  <style>  </style>  </head> <body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple> <div class=Section1> I have continued on the NSClient++ path. I have recently added windows counters such as thread count and paging on the windows machines. It seems to work well for now. I will continue to keep expanding and see what it does. <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Thanks for all the input.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div> <div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'> From: nagios-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:nagios-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Frost, Mark {PBG} Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 9:40 AM To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] NSClient++ or NRPE<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> <o:p> </o:p> This discussion intrigues me...<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> We've been using NRPE_NT with our Windows boxes (probably around 200 that we're monitoring) because I think I had the impression that this was the more commonly used of the two (NRPE/nsclient++). We primarily use it to call the wincheck_counter.exe file to probe Windows' PDH counters. However, from seeing the responses so far I'd say it appears that the majority of folks are using nsclient++ instead.<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> I had considered nsclient++ at one time because it doesn't appear that nrpe_nt is actively developed anymore, yet nsclient++ has a lot of activity. When I tried it out, I did have some difficulty getting it working properly and eventually gave up on it. Then again, I maybe just didn't give it enough time and didn't understand how it worked well enough. It seemed to me that you mostly were able to probe things that it gave you the opportunity to probe. With NRPE_NT and wincheck_counter.exe (which doesn't seem to me to be run by all that many people either...) we could probe anything that was returnable by the PDH lib.<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> I also had the impression that nsclient++ carried a bigger footprint than NRPE_NT did.<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> One problem we've seen with NRPE_NT and wincheck_counter.exe is that it seems rather unreliable on Win2k machines -- at least for the things we commonly check like cpu, memory and disk space. A number of times it will just time out.<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> Another list member indicated that they'd had crashes with Win2k3 -- we've never seen that.<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> Given that nsclient++ seems much more widely used and is still actively developed, I'm considering giving it another shot.<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> This issue of figuring out what's widely used has come up for me before with Nagios. When I was trying to figure out whether to use nagiosgraph or nagiosgrapher, for example. Just because something's in the Nagios Exchange, doesn't mean it's any good, actively supported, or perhaps even worth using. I wish I could send out a poll :-)<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> Mark<o:p></o:p> <blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'> <o:p> </o:p> <div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'> <hr size=2 width="100%" align=center> </div> From: nagios-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:nagios-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Marco Borsani Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 4:24 AM To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Nagios-users] R: R: NSClient++ or NRPE<o:p></o:p> I have Nagios 1.4 on Linux server.<o:p></o:p> 374 hosts (Linux/Unix,Windows and network equipment)<o:p></o:p> 877 services<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> More than 40 windows systems have NSClient++ installed<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Regards<o:p></o:p> Marco<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div> <div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'> <hr size=2 width="100%" align=center> </div> Da: nagios-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:nagios-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] Per conto di Antonio Pereira Inviato: gioved� 7 giugno 2007 17.36 A: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Oggetto: Re: [Nagios-users] R: NSClient++ or NRPE<o:p></o:p> </div> <o:p> </o:p> The way I have set up is Nagios 2.7 on Linux and installed NSClient++ on windows servers. I am monitoring the windows servers using NSClient++.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Is this the best option? I want to make sure before I go any further in configuration. I am presently monitoring 2 windows servers.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div> <div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'> From: nagios-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:nagios-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Marco Borsani Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:30 AM To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Nagios-users] R: NSClient++ or NRPE<o:p></o:p> </div> </div> <o:p> </o:p> On unix/linux system you can use only NRPE.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> On Microsoft system you can use NSClient++ (that contains both features of old NSClient and NRPE).<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Regards<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Marco<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div> <div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'> <hr size=2 width="100%" align=center> </div> Da: nagios-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:nagios-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] Per conto di Antonio Pereira Inviato: gioved� 7 giugno 2007 17.07 A: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Oggetto: [Nagios-users] NSClient++ or NRPE<o:p></o:p> </div> <o:p> </o:p> Hello,<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> I am trying to figure out which one is better to use and I am having a difficult time to determine which is better. So I figured I would ask all of you.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Which one is better NRPE or NSClient++?<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Thanks<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'> <hr size=2 width="100%" noshade style='color:#D2D3D2' align=center> </div> Avis Le present message n'est destine qu'a la personne ou a l'entite a qui il est adresse et peut contenir des renseignements de nature privilegiee et confidentielle. Si le lecteur du present message n'est pas le destinataire prevu ou encore la personne chargee de remettre ce message au destinataire prevu, veuillez nous aviser immediatement. Toute diffusion, distribution ou reproduction des renseignements contenus dans ce message ou des documents qui lui sont joints est strictement interdite. ________________________________________ Notice This message is intended only for the use of individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this message or the information contained herein or attached hereto is strictly prohibited.<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'> <hr size=2 width="100%" noshade style='color:#D2D3D2' align=center> </div> Avis Le pr�sent message n'est destin� qu'� la personne ou � l'entit� � qui il est adress� et peut contenir des renseignements de nature privil�gi�e et confidentielle. Si le lecteur du pr�sent message n'est pas le destinataire pr�vu ou encore la personne charg�e de remettre ce message au destinataire pr�vu, veuillez nous aviser imm�diatement. Toute diffusion, distribution ou reproduction des renseignements contenus dans ce message ou des documents qui lui sont joints est strictement interdite. ________________________________________ Notice This message is intended only for the use of individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this message or the information contained herein or attached hereto is strictly prohibited.<o:p></o:p> </blockquote> </div>  <hr color='#D2D3D2' noshade> Avis Le pr�sent message n'est destin� qu'� la personne ou � l'entit� � qui il est adress� et peut contenir des renseignements de nature privil�gi�e et confidentielle. Si le lecteur du pr�sent message n'est pas le destinataire pr�vu ou encore la personne charg�e de remettre ce message au destinataire pr�vu, veuillez nous aviser imm�diatement. Toute diffusion, distribution ou reproduction des renseignements contenus dans ce message ou des documents qui lui sont joints est strictement interdite. ________________________________________ Notice This message is intended only for the use of individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this message or the information contained herein or attached hereto is strictly prohibited. </body></html>