<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)"> <style>  </style> </head> <body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple> <div class=Section1> I have a weird issue going on with a new Nagios install. I am running 2.2 (although I was on 2.0 and tried 2.1 then 2.2 to fix this) on CentOS 4 built from source, Apache 2.0.52-22, kernel version 2.6.9-34.EL. So here is my issue. I started by adding some NRPE checks for my Windows servers. I then went in to add check_icmp via generic-services (it was check-ping previously) I modify the parameters to fit etc, etc. I restart Nagios and cruse on over to the web interface and click service detail and there they are in a pending state, all is well. I wait around for the checks to happen and as soon as the page refreshes or if I go to another link on Nagios then back to service detail those checks only are gone! Completely gone! I restart Nagios and go back to the web interface -> Service detail and there they are in a pending state, then after a refresh or change to another link and back, gone again! Happens every time. The odd thing is it doesn’t happen all of the time. What I mean is that if I continue to click to different links and back they will come back then some continued refreshing or changing of links will make them disappear. Sometimes they will stay there for a bit but you can guarantee sooner or later they will disappear. <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> To add to the oddity, those checks all show as warning even though the perfdata is showing that it is not in a warning state per my definition and a manual run from the command line shows OK. Now just to make sure I didn’t do something stupid with configs I did a diff on this section on this config vurses a config that I have on another Nagios box doing the same exact check (running 2.1 btw) and they are identical. <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> I hate to say it but this really sounds like a bug but I am willing to try some suggestions if anyone out there has any.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Thanks<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Curt<o:p></o:p> </div> </body> </html>