<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; ">Nope, they match.<DIV> </DIV><DIV> <DIV><DIV>On Feb 23, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Toto Capuccino wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite">my 2 cents: check that the IP of the host in hosts.cfg is the good one. <DIV>2006/2/23, Tom Healy <<A href="mailto:thealy@nortom.com">thealy@nortom.com</A>>:<BLOCKQUOTE class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I can't seem to get nrpe to work correctly, the web interface reports connection refused, but if I run it via the command line it gets results. Example below: On remote solaris 9 box: # ./nrpe -n -c nrpe.cfg -d # ps -ef|grep nrp nagios 1125 1 0 11:51:51 ? 0:00 ./nrpe -n -c nrpe.cfg -d # ./check_nrpe -n -H <A href="http://127.0.0.1">127.0.0.1</A> -c check_users USERS OK - 26 users currently logged in |users=26;75;100;0 On nagios server (solaris 9) as user nagios: ------------------------------- # ./check_nrpe -n -H <A href="http://xxx.foobar.com">xxx.foobar.com</A> -c check_users USERS OK - 26 users currently logged in |users=26;75;100;0 On same nagios server, but the web interface: --------------------------------------------- check_users.process CRITICAL 02-23-2006 11:52:31 0d 0h 59m 1s 3/3 Connection refused by host Config entry for this host: --------------------------- define service{ host_name <A href="http://xxx.foobar.com">xxx.foobar.com</A> service_description check_users.process check_command check_nrpe!check_users max_check_attempts 3 normal_check_interval 5 retry_check_interval 1 check_period 24x7 notification_interval 5 notification_period 24x7 notification_options c,r contact_groups healy } Check commands entry for the server: ------------------------------------- # Check NRPE Daemon define command{ command_name check_nrpe command_line /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_nrpe -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -c $ARG1$ } nrpe 2.4 compiled from source, both boxes solaris 9. Running nagios Nagios 2.0b4 (upgrading soon). Is this a bug in the 2.0b4 branch or am I just being dense & missing something obvious? -Tom </BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>