Misplaced advice in the Nagios preflight check?

[C. Bensend]

> Have you tried giving that contact the extra options Nagios wants, and
> then defining a service escalation for that contact with the
> escalation_options directive set to u?

No, I haven't.  It *seems* to be working as I intend.  My question is
more as to why Nagios seems to think it's a bad idea, when it's a
perfectly legitimate configuration.  Are there unforeseen consequences
that I'm not aware of?  Or was it just not a configuration anyone
thought would be useful/valid, so it is warned about?


-- 
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere,
someone said to themselves, 'You know, I want to set those people
over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.'"  
                       -- George Carlin


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null