permissions issues with nagiosql

[Mike Guthrie]

On 12/13/2011 10:11 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> hey guys im having permissions issues and getting the following message
>
> Cannot open/overwrite the configuration file (check the permissions)!
Take a look at the permissions on the files in the nagios/etc 
directory.  Apache needs RWX permissions on those files in order to be 
able to manage them.

>
> i did some googling and game up with
> http://www.nagiosql.org/forum/installation-issues/195-permissions.html
>
> should i have some template config files somehwere? From what I am
> seeing i do not have any demo configs showing up anywhere
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Systems Optimization Self Assessment
> Improve efficiency and utilization of IT resources. Drive out cost and
> improve service delivery. Take 5 minutes to use this Systems Optimization
> Self Assessment. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51450054/
> _______________________________________________
> Nagios-users mailing list
> Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue.
> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


-- 


Mike Guthrie
Technical Team
___
Nagios Enterprises, LLC
Email:  mguthrie at nagios.com
Web:    www.nagios.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Systems Optimization Self Assessment
Improve efficiency and utilization of IT resources. Drive out cost and 
improve service delivery. Take 5 minutes to use this Systems Optimization 
Self Assessment. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51450054/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null