Scheduled checks falling far behind

[Andreas Ericsson]

On 10/24/2010 12:31 AM, Litwin, Matthew wrote:
> 
> On Oct 22, 2010, at 6:53 PM, Frost, Mark {PBC} wrote:
> 
>> Matthew,
>> 
>> You don't say, but my guess would be that you have high latencies.
>> That is for one of several reasons, Nagios is not able to run
>> checks when it thinks it should.  You can see this information and
>> other stats by looking at the Performance item near the bottom of
>> the Nav pane in the Nagios web interface.
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> I have set up MRTG to track nagios performace and it is reporting
> that latency for host and service checks are next to nothing and
> service execution time is just under 400 ms, however, host checks are
> coming back at around 4 seconds. Based on the samples that are in the
> MRTG section of the tuning guide, my stats would indicate that
> service execution times are fine, but that host execution checks are
> high.
> 

If you're not already using check_icmp instead of check_ping, switch
now so successful hostchecks complete early.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson at op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231

Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
on peace.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in  U.S. and Canada
$10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing
Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null