NSCA strange behaviour

[Cedric Jeanneret]

Hello Marcel,

well, same on server01 and client22... working-server has an earlier one, but it works on this.

NSCA doesn't show me any encryption error (encryption method and passphrase are correct on both ends) :/

Regards,

C.

On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:34:43 -0200
Marcel <mitsuto at gmail.com> wrote:

> check openssl versions and compatibility.
> 
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Cedric Jeanneret <
> cedric.jeanneret at camptocamp.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello again,
> >
> > In fact, configuration files are dployed via puppet(
> > http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki), so all files (should be) are
> > the same. I'll check it, but as puppet runs on every hosts, they all should
> > have the same files.
> > IP addresses are the same (fixed IP, fixed ports).
> >
> > I'll check files once again.
> >
> > If anyone has another idea...
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > C.
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:31:59 -0600
> > Greg Pangrazio <pangrazi at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > It sounds like there is something that changed with the re-install.
> > >
> > > Is the IP address of the system the same?
> > >
> > > Did you pick the same encryption type in the nsca config?
> > >
> > > Can you diff the nsca config with a working host?
> > > Greg Pangrazio
> > > pangrazi at gmail.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Cedric Jeanneret
> > > <cedric.jeanneret at camptocamp.com> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > As far as I can see, only new one. Even if they are just reinstalled
> > (client22 was in nagios config before it was reinstalled....).
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > C.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:08:03 -0600
> > > > Greg Pangrazio <pangrazi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Do all of your clients fail, or just the new one?
> > > >>
> > > >> Greg Pangrazio
> > > >> pangrazi at gmail.com
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Cedric Jeanneret
> > > >> <cedric.jeanneret at camptocamp.com> wrote:
> > > >> > Hello,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'm having troubles with NSCA.
> > > >> > What we have :
> > > >> >
> > > >> > - about 47 passive hosts
> > > >> > - about 220 passive services
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Versions : all are redhat servers, with:
> > > >> > - NSCA 2.7.2 (latest one)
> > > >> > - Nagios 3.1.2
> > > >> >
> > > >> > We have a single "nagios aggregator", which collect all NSCA status
> > from the other hosts.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > What's happening:
> > > >> > a host was reinstalled yesterday (say client22), and now it seems
> > NSCA daemon on the aggregator (say server01) doesn't seem to collect data.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > What I've done:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > - tcpdump on both client22 and server01, both show me traffic
> > between them, on NSCA default port (5667)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > - checked iptables rules, all is ok (as tcpdump shows me traffic,
> > that's a confirmation)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > - trying to push status by hand from client22 to server01; ALL
> > packets are sent successfully """1 data packet(s) sent to host
> > successfully.""". I've done this with a loop like that:
> > > >> > for i in $(seq 1000); do /usr/local/bin/submit_ochp $(hostname -f)
> > UP 'Host is up'; sleep 2; done
> > > >> >
> > > >> > - Enbling debug for nsca on server01 doesn't show me anything
> > interesting. I just don't see where nsca catch up client22 status, and it
> > keeps on saying :
> > > >> > Warning: The results of host 'client22.domain.lt' are stale by 0d
> > 0h 2m 0s (threshold=0d 0h 6m 0s).  I'm forcing an immediate check of the
> > host.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On another hand, it shows me:
> > > >> > [1260267958.216051] [016.1] [pid=23191] Check results for service
> > 'Cron service' on host 'client22.domain.lt' are fresh.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I really don't know where to find a solution, neither where is the
> > real problem. We have another network with about 200 passive hosts and over
> > 350 passive services, and it works fine.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The only differences are :
> > > >> > - the working network is debian-only
> > > >> > - the working network's NSCA server doesn't do anything else than
> > central nagios server. server01 does some other stuff, like syslog server
> > and collectd server... maybe there's a bottleneck in there, but I can't be
> > sure about that.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Does anyone of you have an idea ?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thank you in advance.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Best regards,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > C.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Cédric Jeanneret                 |  System Administrator
> > > >> > 021 619 10 32                    |  Camptocamp SA
> > > >> > cedric.jeanneret at camptocamp.com  |  PSE-A / EPFL
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > Return on Information:
> > > >> > Google Enterprise Search pays you back
> > > >> > Get the facts.
> > > >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
> > > >> >
> > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > >> > Nagios-users mailing list
> > > >> > Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> > > >> > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> > reporting any issue.
> > > >> > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to
> > /dev/null
> > > >> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cédric Jeanneret                 |  System Administrator
> > > > 021 619 10 32                    |  Camptocamp SA
> > > > cedric.jeanneret at camptocamp.com  |  PSE-A / EPFL
> > > >
> > > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Return on Information:
> > > > Google Enterprise Search pays you back
> > > > Get the facts.
> > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Nagios-users mailing list
> > > > Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> > > > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> > reporting any issue.
> > > > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
> > > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cédric Jeanneret                 |  System Administrator
> > 021 619 10 32                    |  Camptocamp SA
> > cedric.jeanneret at camptocamp.com  |  PSE-A / EPFL
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Return on Information:
> > Google Enterprise Search pays you back
> > Get the facts.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nagios-users mailing list
> > Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
> > reporting any issue.
> > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
> >


-- 
Cédric Jeanneret                 |  System Administrator
021 619 10 32                    |  Camptocamp SA
cedric.jeanneret at camptocamp.com  |  PSE-A / EPFL
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20091208/dd58d3d1/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null