SNMP/Windows disk usage

[Melanie Pfefer]

Hello again

I downloaded the perl script and indeed I can use it
manually:
./check_snmp_storage.pl -H TROY -C public -m ^[CDE]:
-w 80% -c 90%

D:\ Label:  Serial Number 225e3590:
3%used(2587MB/89495MB) C:\ Label:  Serial Number
8cfa6a13: 27%used(6644MB/25000MB) (<80%) : OK



In nagios, I should define a service and a command to
start using check_snmp_storage.pl. Could you please
help in what I should add?

Many thanks


--- mark.potter at academy.com wrote:

> You will need to actually download the plugin from 
> http://nagios.manubulon.com/snmp_storage.html as it
> is not part of the 
> Nagios plugins package but rather a third party
> plugin.
> 
> Melanie Pfefer <melanie_pfefer at yahoo.co.uk> wrote on
> 02/19/2008 03:37:04 
> PM:
> 
> > Hello
> > 
> > I added this:
> > 
> > define command{
> >         command_name    check_win_storage
> >         command_line    
> $USER3$/check_snmp_storage.pl
> > -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -C $ARG1$ -m $ARG2$ -w $ARG3$ -c
> > $ARG4$
> > }
> > 
> > 
> > define service {
> >         use                     common-service
> >         hostgroup_name          nt-servers
> >         service_description     Check Windows
> drives
> >         check_command 
> > check_win_storage!public!^[CDE]:!80!90!
> > }
> > 
> > the result was: Return code of 127 is out of
> bounds -
> > plugin may be missing
> > 
> > 
> > Any idea?
> > thanks
> > --- mark.potter at academy.com wrote:
> > 
> > > Melanie,
> > > 
> > > I have setup the plugin available here: 
> > > http://nagios.manubulon.com/snmp_storage.html
> and it
> > > works perfectly for 
> > > our needs. It uses SNMP so you would have to
> have
> > > SNMP setup on all of 
> > > your Windows boxes but with that caveat it is
> the
> > > best solution I have 
> > > found for monitoring windows partitions. If you
> are
> > > looking for something 
> > > slightly less complicated or with fewer options
> > > there are many plugins on 
> > > nagiosexchange.com that will do the job. I would
> > > recommend 
> > > check_snmp_storage though due to the options and
> the
> > > robustness of the 
> > > plugin.
> > > 
> > > Best Regards,
> > > 
> > > Mark L. Potter
> > > Systems Engineer
> > > Academy Sports & Outdoors
> > > 1800 N. Mason Rd
> > > Katy, Texas 77449
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Melanie Pfefer <melanie_pfefer at yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote on
> > > 02/19/2008 03:04:23 
> > > AM:
> > > 
> > > > Hello Mark,
> > > > I am interested in monitoring the disks even
> with
> > > no
> > > > exclusions.
> > > > I installed nagios2.9 and the nagios plugin on
> a
> > > linux
> > > > box.
> > > > 
> > > > Would it be possible that you give me what
> you?ve
> > > done
> > > > to monitor the partitions on windows?
> > > > 
> > > > I appreciate your help.
> > > > 
> > > > --- mark.potter at academy.com wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net
> wrote
> > > on
> > > > > 02/18/2008 11:22:05 
> > > > > AM:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > mark.potter at academy.com schrieb:
> > > > > > > We are using snmp to monitor our windows
> > > servers
> > > > > and I have had a 
> > > > > request 
> > > > > > > from the windows admins. They want to
> alert
> > > at
> > > > > 80% and 90% usage on 
> > > > > C:\ 
> > > > > > > but 95% and 98% on all other partitions.
> (I
> > > > > didn't ask about the logic 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > because it wouldn't matter). I have
> tried
> > > > > multiple snmp plugins and 
> > > > > all of 
> > > > > > > them seem to act the same. I can monitor
> all
> > > the
> > > > > disks on a single 
> > > > > check, 
> > > > > > > a single disk on a single check but I
> cannot
> > > > > monitor all the disks 
> > > > > except 
> > > > > > > C: on a single check. There doesn't seem
> to
> > > be
> > > > > any plugins out there 
> > > > > that 
> > > > > > > allow exclusion and use snmp. Before I
> go
> > > > > writing a wrapper for an 
> > > > > > > existing plugin does anyone know if
> there is
> > > a
> > > > > plugin that will allow 
> > > > > me 
> > > > > > > to do this? I am looking to exclude a
> single
> > > > > drive letter but check 
> > > > > all 
> > > > > > > the rest of the drives via snmp on
> windows
> > > > > servers. Thanks in advance 
> > > > > for 
> > > > > > > any advice.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >
> http://nagios.manubulon.com/snmp_storage.html
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > check_snmp_storage will do the Job
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Joerg
> > > > > That does exactly what we need. Is it listed
> on
> > > > > Nagios Exchange? Thank you 
> > > > > for your response; I have managed to escape
> > > writing
> > > > > a wrapper thanks to 
> > > > > you!
> > > > > >
> > > > 
> > >
> > 
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual
> Studio
> > > > > 2008.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/>
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > > Nagios-users mailing list
> > > > > Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
> > > > > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin
> > > version
> > > > > (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
> > > > > ::: Messages without supporting info will
> risk
> > > being
> > > > > sent to /dev/null
> > > > 
> 
=== message truncated ===



      __________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null