Nagios 3 GUI config tools

[Chris Waters]

Actually Fruity is now called Lilac.  It wasn't a publicity stunt, there
is some history there that stalled developement.  It is being actively
developed.  Nagios 3 support is in the works now that 3.0 is out.
 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lilac/
 
Chris Waters
Technology Services - Network Group
JELD-WEN, Inc.
Information Systems
cwaters at jeld-wen.com
 

________________________________

From: nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:nagios-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Sekhar
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:56 AM
To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Nagios 3 GUI config tools


Hi,
 
I am looking for Nagios 3 GUI config tools for hosts,groups,contacts etc
 
No one seems to be developing nice tool for nagios gui config
 
fruity - this is only publicity stunt RC release nearly 2 years
 
Is there any other tools which can be used for easy configuration of
nagios
 
thanks for your help
 
Best Regards

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20080409/f9ac03bb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null