File formats between 1.x and 2.x

[Andy Shellam (Mailing Lists)]

Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> 1.2 -> 2.0 transition. As is proper, backward-incompatible changes 
> only occur on a "major-version" upgrade. The reason, I think, was that 
> the .log-suffix is usually preserved for files which are only appended 
> to. This has never been the case for any of 
> {downtime,comments,status,retention}.{log,dat}
Cool, that's what I'd thought.
>
> Nopes. If I were you I'd drop 1.x support from NLG though. It's, imo, 
> not worth the trouble to cater to an already small audience that will 
> only diminish in numbers.
>
Also cool - NLG doesn't support 1.x as-is, if the file formats were the 
same I would have been able to check for the existence of either and use 
it, but as it's different, I'll stick with 2.0-onwards only.

Thanks for the clarification, Andreas.

Andy.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null