check_disk 1.4.3 (1.64) for AIX not working?

[Alexander Harvey]

I'm reluctant to use -w ... -c ... -p / -p /usr ... BTW as I'm often having
to add or remove filesystems from these boxes unfortunately. That would mean
each time I add a filesystem I'd also have to change the Nagios check. That
wouldn't really be ideal.

Alex

On 7/17/06, Alexander Harvey <alexh19740110 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/17/06, Ton Voon < ton.voon at altinity.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Looks okay. There's a problem with inodes being -700% on /usr, but
> > otherwise it looks valid.
> >
> > I think the /proc is causing your failure (correctly since there is no
> > free space). Run ./check_disk -w 20% -c 1% -p / -p /usr and that should come
> > back okay.
> >
> > Ton
> >
>
> Yes, I guess it's a feature, not a bug, and definitely /proc is causing
> the problem but then /proc will always show "no space" in AIX because it's
> not a real filesystem. To really work in AIX the 'check_disk' should ignore
> /proc. It's no big deal, my shell script is fine for my purposes.
>
> Thanks for all your efforts for free software, BTW.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Alex
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20060717/f2c6381d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null