More on notifications and reboot monitoring

[Joe Rhett]

> >effectively writing active monitoring support, and it requires both more
> >extra code/complexity and more resources than just using normal ping
> >checks and scheduled downtime.
 
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 03:34:12AM -0500, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> If you'd care to re-write Nagios in such a way that it can scale to 10,000 
> hosts using active checks, I'd be more than happy to use it. Sadly, the 
> current 1 fork (and an exec for non embedded perl checks) per data point 
> just doesn't scale well.
 
You are again making statements as facts that you have not yet provided any
documentation for.  And since many of us on this list are RIGHT NOW using
nagios in a manner that you claim it doesn't scale to, we are having
trouble with your "facts"

-- 
Joe Rhett
Senior Geek
Meer.net


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null