Turn off RED for PASSIVE ONLY checks?

Sloane, Robert Raymond SLOANE at mail.ku.edu
Fri Feb 11 22:43:49 CET 2005


It sounds like the behavior had changed from version 1.2 to 2.0.  That
would be a problem for me, since I use quiet a few passive checks with
the check_period set to none.  Is there any possibility of getting the
old behavior back?
-- 
Bob Sloane, University of Kansas Computer Center, Lawrence, KS, 66045
Email:sloane at ku.edu http://www.ku.edu/home/sloane Phone:(785)864-0444
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net 
> [mailto:nagios-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf 
> Of Emmett Hogan
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 11:57 AM
> To: Anthony.Caetano at t-systems.co.za
> Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Turn off RED for PASSIVE ONLY checks?
> 
> 
> Ok....here's what I did:
> 
> - Set active_check to 1
> - Set check_period to "none"
> - Set active_checks_enabled to 1
> - Set freshness_threshold to 120 seconds
> - Set passive_checks_enabled to 1
> 
> According to Marc, if the "Status Data Age" is more than 2 
> minutes, the 
> check_command should be run even though "check_period" is set to 
> "none".  Do I have this right so far?  Well, this gets rid of 
> the red on 
> the TAC page since I don't have any active_checks disabled, but even 
> though my "Status Data Age" is " 0d 8h 47m 26s" the active 
> check is NOT 
> being run. :-(
> 
> -Emmett


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list