Unable to read output from NRPE

[Jason Martin]

On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 09:17:10PM +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> I've been thinking about that (implemented as a handshake), but it would 
> mean redesigning the protocol once again. Backwards compatibility is 
> getting important, and it's getting harder to implement.
I think the handshake part is pretty important. At a minimum it
tells check_nrpe that there is really a NRPE daemon on the other
end and that it was allowed to talk to it. The error messages
generated from check_nrpe could be much more informative if it
has a better idea of what was happening on the remote end.

-Jason Martin
-- 
Postmen never die, they just loose their zip...
This message is PGP/MIME signed.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20050202/a5c67dd5/attachment.sig>