CPu consumption too high

[Guillaume RENARD]

Hello,

Yes, a samba process have taken all the CPU !
Thanks for your answer !

On 12/9/05, Guillaume RENARD <guillaume.renard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks a lot for your
>
> On 12/9/05, Todd Barbera <todd_barbera at wgbh.org> wrote:
> >
> > Given that your CPU's are showing 97 and 99 percent usage by system
> > resources, it sounds like an OS process is chewing up your CPU. Have you run
> > "top" or another similar utility? sar, iostat, and vmstat are useful tools
> > for helping track down performance issues. I know these are available on
> > Solaris, but I can't speak for other *nix servers. Also, since your server
> > has been running for over a year, there's a good chance you're well behind
> > on your OS patch levels. It could be you've hit some sort of bug within your
> > OS.
> >
> > Todd
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >  *From:* Guillaume RENARD <guillaume.renard at gmail.com>
> > *To:* nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > *Sent:* Friday, December 09, 2005 4:52 AM
> > *Subject:* [Nagios-users] CPu consumption too high
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I use Nagios 2.0b5 and I have only 210 services.
> > The problem is that my server is running out of ressource
> >  10:42:05  up 423 days, 19:36,  3 users,  load average: 8.18, 7.29, 6.54
> >
> > But nagios don't use so much ressource :
> >  10:42:35  up 423 days, 19:37,  3 users,  load average: 8.63, 7.47, 6.62
> > 94 processes: 85 sleeping, 9 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> > CPU0 states:   0.0% user  99.4% system    0.0% nice   0.0% iowait   0.1%idle
> > CPU1 states:   2.1% user  97.4% system    0.0% nice   0.0% iowait   0.0%idle
> > Mem:  1547392k av, 1536372k used,   11020k free,       0k shrd,     496k
> > buff
> >                     440520k actv,     424k in_d,   13256k in_c
> > Swap: 2040244k av,    1496k used, 2038748k free                  570160k
> > cached
> >
> >   PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME CPU
> > COMMAND
> > 22562 nagios    25   0  1312 1312   784 R    23.9  0.0    0:04   1
> > nagios
> > 22570 nagios    25   0   464  464   400 D    23.5  0.0   0:03   0
> > check_snmp
> > 22569 nagios    25   0   444  444   388 R    22.4  0.0   0:03   1 urlize
> > 22568 nagios    25   0   468  468   400 R    18.9  0.0   0:05   0
> > check_snmp
> > 22577 nagios    25   0   528  528   468 R    15.9  0.0   0:00   0
> > check_ping
> > 22565 nagios    25   0   484  484   416 S     4.2  0.0   0:04   1 urlize
> > 21191 nagios    15   0  1268 1268   740 S     0.0  0.0   0:15   0 nagios
> > 22390 nagios    24   0  1312 1312   784 S     0.0  0.0   0:00   0 nagios
> > 22391 nagios    21   0  1288 1288   976 S     0.0  0.0   0:06   1
> > apan.sh
> > 22558 nagios    25   0  2344 2344  1400 S     0.0  0.1   0:02   0
> > check_snmp2
> > 22560 nagios    24   0  1312 1312   784 S     0.0  0.0   0:00   0 nagios
> > 22564 nagios    24   0  1312 1312   784 S     0.0  0.0   0:00   0 nagios
> > 22567 nagios    25   0  1312 1312   784 S     0.0  0.0   0:00   1 nagios
> >
> > I am using apan with nagios but it shouldn't take so many ressource.
> >
> >
> > Does someone have an idea please ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Guillaume RENARD
> > http://glmrenard.free.fr
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Guillaume RENARD
> http://glmrenard.free.fr
>



--
Guillaume RENARD
http://glmrenard.free.fr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/users/attachments/20051209/f31b5a85/attachment.html>