trouble getting started: getting error 127 out of bounds on check_http

[Hugo van der Kooij]

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Mehmet Fatih AKBULUT wrote:

> hi Aleykey.
> i myself have the same problem for check_ldaps.
> it says : return code of 127 is out of bounds. plugin may be missing :p
> and looking for help for 2 days in mailing lists.
> and received just RTFM (read the fuckin manual) so far.
> i think people in here dont like to help others much :)
> if u find or receive anything helps you solve this problem please forward it
> to me too.
> because i really need the solution too :)

Did YOU install a check_ldaps command? Because it is not a default service
in one of the sample configs I have seen untill today.

As shown in the manual
(http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/2_0/beginners.html) you need time to
install this or hire someone to do it for you.

The nagios setup is quite logical but you need to put in work, a lot of
work before it runs with all the service checks because some service
checks must be written by you if no one else did it.

You should not take things for granted or assume they are present just
because you like them to be.

Untill now you have not shown to actually understand how Nagios works or
how you need to configure it.

Hugo.

-- 
	I hate duplicates. Just reply to the relevant mailinglist.
	hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org		http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
		Don't meddle in the affairs of magicians,
		for they are subtle and quick to anger.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null