Nagios 2.0 performance

[Ben]

Well that certainly narrows down the choices. :) It's too bad, as it seems 
materialized views would have been a cleaner choice than having cgis 
connect to shared memory segments. But both should work.

On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Jason Martin wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:58:17PM -0700, Ben wrote:
> > codebase more and trying to decide if I should impliment a scheme with
> > shared memory (so that would stay persistant between cgi runs), or a more
> > intelligent usage of the database.... say, maybe, using materialized
> > views. If anybody else has any suggestions on which path to take, I'm all 
> > ears....
> Remember that 2.0 drops DB support...
> 
> -Jason Martin
> -- 
> This message is PGP/MIME signed.
> 




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null