Monitoring MS Exchange

[Tedman Eng]

We use only pop and smtp on our Exchange box, so in our case EMAIL-LOOP
(SMTP and POP3), DISK, and PING covers all the bases.

Would you please suggest your definition of "cover-all-failures".  What do
you consider as required for your environment?




-----Original Message-----
From: Felix Buenemann [mailto:atmosfear at users.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:00 PM
To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] Monitoring MS Exchange


Hi,

does anyone here have a clever script/way for monitoring MS Exchange 2k/2k3?

One can just do some checks for snmp and imap, but's that's not really a
clean 
or cover-all-failures solution.

-- 
Best Regards,
        Atmos
____________________________________________
- MPlayer Developer - http://mplayerhq.hu/ -
____________________________________________


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


-------------------------------------------------------
This Newsletter Sponsored by: Macrovision 
For reliable Linux application installations, use the industry's leading
setup authoring tool, InstallShield X. Learn more and evaluate 
today. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSI/go/ins0030000001msi/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null