Everything works! But I want more!

[Andreas Ericsson]

Mark D. Nagel wrote:
> Ben Hyde wrote:
> 
>> That's only marginally different than what I was doing and I still get 
>> a "Pending" label in my status map for my equivalent of some-hub.  I 
>> guess my real question boils down to: "What is considered the 'right' 
>> way to represent objects in my status map that can not be actively or 
>> passively monitored."
>>
>> Possibly the answer is the above and I should just learn to think of  
>> the "Pending" label as denoting that no useful info is available for 
>> this component.
> 
> 
> You get Pending even with the host in a hostgroup?  You have to include 
> it in a hostgroup for it to be checked.

That's just incorrect. The host does NOT have to be in a hostgroup to be 
checked. Mark, please don't give false answers. Check the documentation 
if you're not sure. Wrong answers leads to all sorts of following 
misunderstandings.

>  The check should succeed 
> always, so it should read as 'OK' in that case.
> 

That depends on the check. A check that always return OK just isn't any 
good.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson at op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Lead Developer


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null