parents question again

[Quanah Gibson-Mount]

--On Thursday, January 22, 2004 2:58 PM -0500 Matt Pounsett 
<matt.pounsett at cira.ca> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>
>> Okay, good point, you don't get the network dependency there. ;)  You
>> still  get the correct mapping for the two nagios servers though, which
>> is really  what I want more than anything.
>
> Right.. but if you're not getting dependancies, then you've broken the way
> the parent/child relationship is intended to work.

Well, you still won't get this with how nagios currently works right now, 
anyway, because you draw the parent/child relationships as they go to 
Nagios, not how they are dependant on one another.  Using your own example, 
if my one and only nagios server is on switch 2, which is dependant on 
switch 1, switch 2 would still need to be the parent of switch 1 for Nagios 
to function correctly.

--Quanah


--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null