Apache 2.0.52 mod_ssl MSIE statuswrl.cgi not loading

[Shawn Iverson]

Okay, my earlier attempt at matching anything but statuswrl.cgi with a
regular expression is incorrect (I am able to hit other cgi's with
http://).  I welcome anyone who has a better grasp of regular
expressions to correct me on this.

Shawn Iverson
Technology Associate
MCP W2K3S and W2KP, Linux+, Network+, A+
New Castle Community School Corporation
shawn at nccsc.k12.in.us


On Tuesday, December 21, 2004 6:45 PM Shawn wrote:
>
>Typo below, should be:
>
><Files ~ "!(statuswrl\.cgi)$">
>
>I also made an extra Directory directive to allow images to be 
>loaded into statuswrl.cgi over http://.
>

>
>On Tuesday, December 21, 2004 6:12 PM Shawn wrote:
>
>>    <Files "!(statuswrl\.cgi)$">
>>        SSLRequireSSL
>>    </Files>
>></Directory>
>>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from 
>real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. 
>Start reading now. 
>http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Nagios-users mailing list
>Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
>::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS 
>when reporting any issue. 
>::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null