SNMP Error while getting HD space

[Ryan Brown]

Yes I did. Same problem.

Ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephan Janosch [mailto:stephan.janosch at interface-business.de] 
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 3:45 AM
To: Ryan Brown
Cc: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] SNMP Error while getting HD space

Ryan Brown wrote:
> ....
> 
> Does anyone have any pointers or ideas on where I can start to diagnose
this
> problem?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Ryan Brown

Did you try to use the IP at the host definitionen?

define host {
...
host_name	<some_name>
address		<some_ip>
..}

define service {
...
host_name	<some_name>
...
}

Then $HOSTADRESS$ should contain the IP address of the host. It's only 
an idea, because I don't use nagios 2 yet. the $HOSTADDRESS$ macro is 
only aviable at nagios 2.x.

Stephan



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null