Page on Critical Only?

[jeff vier]

On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 12:58 -0600, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> jeff vier wrote: 
> > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 11:19 -0600, Emmett Hogan wrote: 
> >  
> >>Strange....my docs mention nothing about "State Restrictions"...is 
> >>this something only in the 1.x CVS release?  (Or, more likely, I am 
> >>looking at the wrong doc: docs/escalations.html) 
> >  
> >  
> > Oh, yeah, maybe that's not in 1.x - I'm running 2.x.  Sorry about
> that. 
> >  
> > you should run 2.x ;) 
> > 
> 
> Actually, no. Nagios 2.0 HEAD has a memory leak which will
> inevitably  
> (given enough time) crash it. Unless you specifically need some
> features  
> in 2.0 you should be running 1.2 (or whatever the latest 1.x is).

What is your metric of 'enough time'?

I run it and have no 'real' issues that I can discern.

I have [distributed] sites with daemon uptimes well into weeks and
sometimes over a month (between adds/changes).

I noted in the -devel discussion that you were talking about -HUPs - I
never -HUP my nag daemons, I only stop/start in case one of the threads
hang.  Maybe that's the difference.



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null