LDAP Auth - FAQ anyone ?

[Stanley Hopcroft]

Dear Sir,

I am writing to thank you for your letter and say,

> >>> "Martin, Kennison" <kmartin at LTHS.NET> 4/8/2004 11:43:01 AM >>>
> I use the following to authenticate with active directory and it works
> great.
> 
> <Directory "/usr/local/nagios/sbin">
> Order allow,deny
> AuthName "Nagios South"
> AuthType Basic
> AuthLDAPUrl
> LDAP://server.local/ou=Technical,dc=server,dc=local?sAMAccounName?sub?
> AuthLDAPBindDN cn=apacheuser,cn=users,dc=server,dc=local
> AuthLDAPBindPassword ********
> Require valid-user
> Allow from all
> </Directory>

there appears to be no FAQ about scalable web authentication - ie don't
have to modify .htpassword for each new user/group - so would you
consider submitting one on Nagios LDAP auth ?

http://www.nagios.org/faqs/addfaq.php

Yours sincerely.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stanley Hopcroft
------------------------------------------------------------------------

'...No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the
continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a
manor of thy friend's or of thine own were. Any man's death diminishes
me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know
for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee...'

from Meditation 17, J Donne.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null