Acknowledge alert?

Marc Powell mpowell at ena.com
Tue May 6 22:37:09 CEST 2003


I don't recall. I think I just 'discovered' it.

--
Marc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: VANTASSLE, GEORDON M (SBCSI) [mailto:gv2385 at sbc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 3:16 PM
> To: Marc Powell; nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> *smacks forehead*
> 
> That's the difference!  IS that somewhere in the documentation?  I'm
> still going through it, so I may not have staggered across it yet.
> 
> Thanks a bunch, Marc!
> 
> Geordon
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Powell [mailto:mpowell at ena.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 3:15 PM
> > To: VANTASSLE, GEORDON M (SBCSI); Subhendu Ghosh;
> > nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Acknowledge alert?
> >
> >
> > The service must be in a HARD state to be able to Acknowledge
> > it. In your case it would need to fail 3 checks in a row to
> > show the Acknowledge option.
> >
> > marc
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: VANTASSLE, GEORDON M (SBCSI) [mailto:gv2385 at sbc.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 2:56 PM
> > > To: 'Subhendu Ghosh'; nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > >
> > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Subhendu Ghosh [mailto:sghosh at sghosh.org]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 1:31 PM
> > > > To: nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Acknowledge alert?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 6 May 2003, VANTASSLE, GEORDON M (SBCSI) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > How do I acknowledge an alert?  I am probably missing it
> > > > somewhere in
> > > > > the documentation, and would appreciate a point-to.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > When looking at the service detail - the acknowledge commands is
> > > > listed in the "service commands" box on the right
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -sg
> > >
> > > Ok, that's what I *thought* it should be.  But, (using Nagios
1.0),
> > this
> > > is
> > > what I have on the screen (see attached)
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Geordon
> > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: PGP 8.0
> > > Comment: This message signed to ensure authenticity.
> > >
> > > iQA/AwUBPrgSnBnDT1v4QosXEQKHCgCeKUnv6sQFWtbnJUrnx5HY9ul5D3UAn3lr
> > > l5GMrgjf2nDy2qHMl4j/5m7D
> > > =UmIh
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> >
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.0
> Comment: This message signed to ensure authenticity.
> 
> iQA/AwUBPrgXZRnDT1v4QosXEQJaNACfVJ2Hg0yiZ3oJ5oLJtt7E0vWjbsYAnR17
> IaU7gvuJlAP4AxUIz7PFrhtd
> =Fq1X
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-------------------------------------------------------
Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
www.enterpriselinuxforum.com

_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list