Nagios 1.1 -- tac.cgi cosmetic problem?

john.barro at shaw.ca john.barro at shaw.ca
Wed Jun 4 02:26:33 CEST 2003


I experience the same results after installing Nagios 1.1 on my Redhat 7.3 system.  I was previously running version 1.0 which did not experience that symptom.  I did not examine any directories nor was I going to worry about it as I figured it may have been user initiated.

John

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carroll, Jim P [Contractor]" <jcarro10 at sprintspectrum.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 3, 2003 5:35 pm
Subject: [Nagios-users] Nagios 1.1 -- tac.cgi cosmetic problem?

> Greets all,
> 
> I installed Nagios 1.1 today, and noticed a slight
> cosmetic change.  I don't think this was intentional.
> I examined what's in the ../sbin directory, and all
> the .cgi files have a timestamp from 10:48am this morning.
> 
> I took a screencap (see attached).  Take a look at the
> mid-screen, under "Services".  It lists "26 Critical",
> but spans all 5 table colums, leaving Warning, Unknown,
> Ok and Pending pushed off to the side.
> 
> Am I the only one experiencing this?
> 
> (In case you noticed it, yes, I've still got the Authenticate
> tweak in the sidebar.  I reinstated it after making a backup
> copy of that file and comparing it to the 1.0 version.
> Otherwise, all the .html and .cgi files which should have been
> installed appear to be there, thanks to the "make install"
> after compilation.)
> 
> If I've managed to fat-finger something, let me know.  :)
> 
> jc
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:  Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list