Output trashed when using multiple values with upper boundaries with check_snmpp / snmppd

Michael Markstaller mm at elabnet.de
Mon Apr 7 12:46:56 CEST 2003


Hi, 

I'm using snmppd as it speeds things up significantly with many snmp-checks and it works fine so far, but when specifying upper boundaries (in this case Cisco CPU) with more than one value polled, the returned output-values get trashed somehow. Although it still reports the correct status, it's just a bit annoying as I cannot see the polled values in Nagios anymore.. 
any hints ?

./check_snmpp -t 5 -H XXX -o .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.57.0,.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.58.0 -C XXX -w :90,:75 -c :95,:90 
SNMP OK -£#@£#@
./check_snmpp -t 5 -H XXX -o .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.57.0,.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.58.0 -C XXX -w :13
SNMP OK -17 17
./check_snmpp -t 5 -H XXX -o .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.57.0,.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.58.0 -C XXX -w ,:13
SNMP WARNING - 14 *17*
./check_snmpp -t 5 -H XXX -o .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.57.0,.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.58.0 -C XXX -w :13,:13
SNMP WARNING -£#@£#@

the original check_snmp works this way:
./check_snmp -t 5 -H XXX -o .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.57.0,.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.58.0 -C XXX -w :90,:75 -c :95,:90 -l 'CPU usage 1min/5min' -D ' / '
CPU usage 1min/5min OK - 12 / 15

regards

Michael Markstaller


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null





More information about the Users mailing list