[Nagios-devel] nrpe RPM spec file bug(s)

[SCHAER Frederic]

Hi lists,

 

I just checked in the CVS tree, and nagios/nrpe spec files still
contains the non-system groupadds ...

It's not that I'm willing to see this changes at all costs in the
official spec files since I have patched ones for now, but I guess I'm
not the only one this kind of update will help... am I ?

 

Regards

 

________________________________

From: nagios-devel-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:nagios-devel-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of SCHAER
Frederic
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 4:26 PM
To: Nagios Developers List
Subject: Re: [Nagios-devel] nrpe RPM spec file bug(s)

 

Hmmm... by the way, the nagios.spec file has the same defect : it's
using "groupadd" whereas it's using "useradd -r" ... if this could also
be corrected...

 

Regards

 

________________________________

From: nagios-devel-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:nagios-devel-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of SCHAER
Frederic
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 2:06 PM
To: nagios-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-devel] nrpe RPM spec file bug(s)

 

Hi,

 

In the nagios spec file, the nagios user is added with command < useradd
-r > which creates a system account + system group.

 

In the nrpe spec file, there is first a standard groupadd on the Nagios
group, and then a useradd with the -r option for the user.

It looks to me that the first groupadd is then useless, isn't it ?

 

By the way : when the groupadd is run, there's a grep on the hardcoded
"nagios" value, while just after the %{nsgrp} is used to add the group,
which is also a bug I think...

 

Nevertheless, if the groupadd has to be kept, would it be possible to
use it also with the "-r" option ? This way, a system group would be
created.

This would avoid conflicts with standard users/groups, and this would
also make things more consistent.

 

I can easily patch the spec file, but I'm using nrpe on a few hundred
machines, and I guess other people managing clusters may face the same
problem of GID conflicts that I just did, which could probably be easily
be avoided.... so here I'm sharing the problem and potential solution.

 

Thanks for patching && regards && merry Christmas ! :]

Frederic

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.monitoring-lists.org/archive/developers/attachments/20080103/693064c2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null